Resumen:
Me parece indicado comenzar haciendo referencia al postfacio de esta obra, donde Donna Orange reconoce su sorpresa (p. 119). Inicialmente pretendía tender un puente entre su vida filosófica y su vida clínica – tiene ambas formaciones y prácticas -, pero no esperaba activar tantos aspectos éticos en este empeño. Siempre ha considerado el psicoanálisis más una vocación que una profesión, actitud que se ha visto reforzada tras el estudio de estos filósofos que mostraron un profundo interés por la ética. Por mi parte, la lectura de este importante librito me ha resultado sumamente provechosa, aunque disienta de su interpretación en aspectos fundamentales, como se verá.
Palabras clave:
Rodríguez,
Filosofía,
Psicoterapia Clínica,
Orange.
Abstract:
He seems to me to be indicated to start by referring to the postfacio of this work, where Donna Orange recognizes his surprise (p. 119). Initially it was trying to build bridges between his philosophical life and his clinical life - it has both formations and practices-, but it was not expecting to activate so many ethical aspects in this determination. Always he has considered to be the psychoanalysis more a vocation than a profession, attitude that has met reinforced after the study of these philosophers who showed a deep interest for the ethics. For my part, the reading of this one important librito me has turned out to be extremely profitable, though it dissents from his interpretation in fundamental aspects, since one will see.
English title:Review of Thinking for the clinician.
Philosophical Resources for Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Humanistic Psychotherapy.
Keywords: Philosophy, clinical psychoterapy, Orange, Sutil
Referencia:
Rodriguez Sutil, C. (2010). Reseña de la obra de D. Orange: Thinking for Clinicians. Clínica e Investigación Relacional, 4 (3): 706-719. [ISSN 1988-2939].